Wizened Women

Smart women muse on topics both smart and stupid
Home­FAQ­Search­Register­Memberlist­Usergroups­Log in
Post new topic   Reply to topicShare | 
 

 Politics

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Goto page : Previous  1 ... 16 ... 29, 30, 31  Next
AuthorMessage
Green Eyez



Number of posts: 1466
Registration date: 2007-04-05

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:14 pm

I did see her on SNL. Funny, because I felt she was really "in her element" there. She is WAY more comfortable on TV/behind a newsdesk and entertaining than she is at politics.

Her whole "good sport" thing I thought came off pretty well. She seems like a really fun person. That doesn't mean I want her a heartbeat away from the presidency.

The thing with shooting the moose was hilarious. I was surprised she was totally OK with it. I guess she wanted to show she could poke fun at herself. That's why the politicians go on these things. So we can see that they're real people with a good sense of humor.

Still, I don't agree with anything she stands for.

So, to sum up:

Go out for a night on the town with her? SURE!

Having her as the next VP? Not so much.

Also! CHECK THIS OUT!!!

Quote:
Powell endorses Obama, chides McCain campaign tone

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, Associated Press Writer Stephen Ohlemacher, Associated Press Writer – 37 mins ago

AP – Former Secretary of State Powell endorses Obama

WASHINGTON – Colin Powell, a Republican who was President Bush's first secretary of state, endorsed Democrat Barack Obama for president Sunday and criticized the tone of Republican John McCain's campaign.

The former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said either candidate, both of them senators, is qualified to be commander in chief. But he said Obama is better suited to handle the nation's economic problems as well as help improve its standing in the world.

"It isn't easy for me to disappoint Sen. McCain in the way that I have this morning, and I regret that," Powell, interviewed on NBC's "Meet the Press," said of his longtime friend, the Arizona senator.

But, he added: "I think we need a transformational figure. I think we need a president who is a generational change and that's why I'm supporting Barack Obama, not out of any lack of respect or admiration for Sen. John McCain."

Powell's endorsement has been much anticipated because he is a Republican with impressive foreign policy credentials, a subject

_________________
I know what I believe. I will continue to articulate what I believe and what I believe - I believe what I believe is right.

-George W. Bush, in Rome, July 22, 2001
Back to top Go down
View user profile
abrahammy



Number of posts: 800
Localisation: On the Dreadhead bus. See?
Registration date: 2007-04-04

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Sun Oct 19, 2008 11:05 pm

Sarah Palin is a good sport and not a terrible actress. She is not a good candidate and she's be a terrible President.

Colin Powell endorsing Obama is very important, and he was extraordinarily eloquent on the subject. Pat Buchanan looks like he's going to have a stroke.

I did something I've never done before today; I canvassed. I got on the phone and called people in New Mexico. Totally not even close to my comfort zone. But I did it.

He's got to win this thing.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
frazzle



Number of posts: 1426
Registration date: 2007-04-04

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:43 am

YAY for abrahammy!!!!

I would love to know how you were received.

I spent my day at AIDS Walk L.A. As a volunteer my job was to take photos. I got some great ones of all sorts of people...kids, teens, girls, boys, men, women, every race I know about, and my fave (which I will post here), a couple of Tatoo people.

The woman said to me with pride, "We are both Positive, and have been coming to AIDS Walk for 25 years".

I cannot tell you how wonderful that is. People are living with HIV these days longer and better and with fewer drugs.

The cloud hangs, though, because the epidemic is so rampant worldwide.

SO far we are very lucky in the U.S. in that it has not spread that much to heterosexuals. But there is nothing about the virus that excludes us..we are just lucky (as long as we don't share needles...the people in the pic got it before they knew that tattoo needles must not be shared, even if disinfected).

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Green Eyez



Number of posts: 1466
Registration date: 2007-04-05

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:29 am

Abrahammy, I am curious how you were received by New Mexico. Having recently been there myself (grr...my friend STILL has my SIM card) I found the political lines there to be drawn quite clearly.

Where my friend (the Republican) has her cabin, it was all VERY VERY conservative. The next town over only had a Republican headquarters. I knew to keep my Obama-lovin' ass VERY quiet!

Now, when we got to the big city, Santa Fe, that all changed around the other way. Obama stickers everywhere. That's where I saw the Bush "Liar" sticker.

My friend says she feels better with the Colin Powell endorsement.

frazz, that's so wonderful that you volunteer there. That is an awesome picture! Those people look really familiar. I can't place it, but feel I know them. So either they're actors or someone I've met.

_________________
I know what I believe. I will continue to articulate what I believe and what I believe - I believe what I believe is right.

-George W. Bush, in Rome, July 22, 2001
Back to top Go down
View user profile
frazzle



Number of posts: 1426
Registration date: 2007-04-04

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:52 am

They acted like performers (in a good way) very comfy interacting, very friendly and charming.

I don't think they are actors who play parts, but maybe were on that show about Tattoo people?

I am also hoping we will hear how it went for abrahammy.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
frazzle



Number of posts: 1426
Registration date: 2007-04-04

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:01 am

The Republican National Committee forked out $150,000 to dress, coif and make up Palin and her family since she was picked two months ago.

And they call themselves the same as regular working people?

The hypocrisy is infuriating.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
frazzle



Number of posts: 1426
Registration date: 2007-04-04

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:01 am

More on Palin and the $150,000 spent on her clothes.

I think buying her (and even her family) some presentable clothes is fine. I can even imagine, given the high-profile of it all, spending a gigantic amount, like $20,000.

$150,000? What the hell did they buy?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
aerwin



Number of posts: 716
Registration date: 2007-04-07

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:33 pm

They spent THAT MUCH on clothes in one month.MOst people could live off that money for two years; Just another reason Sarah Six Pack and John the Plumber MCain are totally out of touch with the middle and working class people of this country.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Green Eyez



Number of posts: 1466
Registration date: 2007-04-05

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:12 pm

It is hilarious that the Republicans are usually the ones with the money and pander to the rich while selling themselves as regular Joe's and painting the dems as "elitest".

I have a good friend who (bear with me) has some Mormon friends with whom we've socialized. Obviously I try not to talk with them about religion and politics and so everything is fine.

Well, one of them sent me an email in favor of prop 8 talking about the bullshit that they'll teach it in schools and that whole "protect marriage" crap.

I knew I had to answer the email, but of course I had to calm down first. Here's what I said:

OK, I have to do something here that doesn't make me entirely comfortable, but I feel I must say something. I shall try to stick to the issue.

You probably don't know this, but I am a liberal democrat. I don't usually have trouble with people who have views different from mine. I always hate to use the "some of my best friends are..." thing, because I think it's very condescending, but I do have a very good and wonderful friend who's a George Bush Republican. We just don't talk about politics. Honestly, though, if she was for this "Prop 8" I would have to reconsider being her friend. I feel that strongly about it.

I feel it is hate wrapped in "protecting marriage". That they will start teaching it in schools is a lie. I, personally wouldn't care either way because I don't believe you are "taught" to be gay or that you have a choice. There are too many gay people raised by heterosexuals, and who even have parents who are anti-gay, who are gay.

This initiative in particular makes me weep. Literally. There are not enough words to express how upset it makes me. I believe that if two people are in love and want to commit to each other for the rest of their lives, it's a beautiful thing.

I also don't think marriage is just a religious institution. Anyone who has gotten a divorce will tell you that!

There are so many heterosexual people out there getting married for the wrong reasons. I feel they are the ones who make a mockery of marriage.

I am a "live and let live" person. As long as someone else doesn't try to tell me that their lifestyle, religion, way of being - is the right way and what I'm doing is the wrong way, then it really doesn't concern me. I guess you and I agree that forcing your beliefs on others is wrong, but disagree on whether gay marriage falls under that category. I don't feel that gay people getting married is forcing their ideas down everyone's throat. I feel that putting intiatives like this on the ballot does that.

I believe that believing in God is believing in tolerance for everyone from all walks of life. That denying someone their constitutional rights is wrong.

I know there's no way for me to convince you what I believe is right and vice-versa. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree and we'll both be praying on election day for the outcome we desire.

Look, Holli, if you had written to me about supporting McCain, I would have let it go, but this initiative is quite the hot button and I felt I needed to state my case as you've stated yours.

Thanks for letting me do that.


UPDATE: She wrote a very nice email back. She agrees to disagree and we both avoided name-calling. All is well.

_________________
I know what I believe. I will continue to articulate what I believe and what I believe - I believe what I believe is right.

-George W. Bush, in Rome, July 22, 2001
Back to top Go down
View user profile
frazzle



Number of posts: 1426
Registration date: 2007-04-04

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:50 am

I actually do not understand what is scary about gay marriage to people who are adamantly against it.

How do they think it will harm their own marriages? How do they think it will harm their children?

I do get it that sex, in and off itself, is kind of icky to think about pretty much all people who are not oneself doing it, but marriage?

Civil unions do not treat the unionees the same in terms of benefits and social security, etc. That is why it is important that gay marriage be allowed.

A life-partner is a life partenr, and all life-partners should be considered..life-partners. With all the same rights and baggage.

Why are they afraid of that?

(Mind you I do understand, however much I diapprove) of people who are just horrified to think of gay sex...but they are also horried to think of sex at all. Mention these words to a person who says they are against gay marriage for some high faluting reason: "mmm, mmm, I was jsut thinking how good it would feel to have George Clooney's penis in my wet vagina."

LOL!!!! PUKE CITY!!!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Green Eyez



Number of posts: 1466
Registration date: 2007-04-05

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:32 pm

OK! Thanks for THAT imagery! Heh.

I know someone who is worried that suddenly gay couples will be walking in the mall and showing affection and how girls kissing girls is the cool thing to do now, even if they're not gay and how her kid is "confused".

I said that first of all, there are currently gay couples all over and just because they can now get married, doesn't mean sudden PDA. Second, I wouldn't care if there was PDA.

Also, as I told her, my mom was pretty overprotective, but some stuff she did do right:

I could talk to her about ANYTHING and she didn't tell me NOT to do drugs and NOT to have sex. She simply said that if I wanted to try drugs I should do it at home and to tell her if I wanted to have sex. No subject was off limits. I could get as graphic with her as I wanted. As a result, I led a clean life.

My friend would say (we've known each other since we're kids) that even if I had pot-smoking parents, I wouldn't have done drugs. I said that wasn't the point.

These people believe that merely TEACHING the kids about homosexuality will MAKE THEM HOMOSEXUALS. Like, some little girl will think "that's a grand idea!" and go get herself a girlfriend. They think teaching about drugs and sex, etc., will make the kid think that it's alright. I am living proof that it's not true. I was taught about everything and I have always been a clean-living heterosexual.

I also said that if I came home "confused" because I saw girls kissing, my mom would explain it to me in a non-judgemental way, thus eliminating the "confusion" and then it became no big deal and that was the end of it.

She even talked about these sluttress singers becoming a 10-year-old's role model. I explained that if that's happened, the parents have fucked up ROYALLY. That this all begins and ends with the parents.

If something is held as taboo, there isn't a kid who won't want to do it. If you make it no big deal, they'll think it's NO BIG DEAL.

So, yeah, these parents are worried their kids are gonna learn about homosexuality in school and suddenly their kid will think it's OK to be a homosexual and then just become one because it's cool. The religious people think the homosexual lifestyle is WRONG because the BIBLE SAYS SO and thus would probably kill themselves if Johnny said he was in love with Jimmy.

My friend asked if she thinks my way is right and the people who are for prop 8 are wrong.

I said that I think denying someone their constitutional rights because of a belief someone else has that is purely based on religion is 100% completely and totally wrong and that my "live and let live" policy is right.

_________________
I know what I believe. I will continue to articulate what I believe and what I believe - I believe what I believe is right.

-George W. Bush, in Rome, July 22, 2001
Back to top Go down
View user profile
abrahammy



Number of posts: 800
Localisation: On the Dreadhead bus. See?
Registration date: 2007-04-04

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:35 pm

Quote:
Civil unions do not treat the unionees the same in terms of benefits and social security, etc. That is why it is important that gay marriage be allowed.

A life-partner is a life partenr, and all life-partners should be considered..life-partners. With all the same rights and baggage.

Why are they afraid of that?


Religion. They take Paul and Leviticus literally and as the word of God. Since I take certain parts of the Bible with a grain of salt, and I am not offended by the idea of gay marriage.

I do think that civil unions SHOULD treat unionees the same in terms of benefits and social security. My position on this is that religions have the right to choose what kind of union they BLESS, but people should be allowed to share their lives and legal assets with anybody they choose as part of the doctrine of the separation of church and state.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
frazzle



Number of posts: 1426
Registration date: 2007-04-04

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:28 am

I am not much of a Bible sholar.

What do Paul and Leviticus say that make people think that gay marriage will hurt them?

I do know the general idea that gay people are abominations (which means they go to hell when they die? or does that mean they should be slaughtered on earth?)...but I don't really know what the Bible says.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
abrahammy



Number of posts: 800
Localisation: On the Dreadhead bus. See?
Registration date: 2007-04-04

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:30 am

Unfortunately, the Bible says that gay people should be executed for having gay sex. And yeah, it does say that. I'm not going to sugarcoat it or try to explain it away. I do think that many biblical laws were very much products of their time and it is very unfortunate that people these days try to apply violent ideas of the past to present circumstances.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
frazzle



Number of posts: 1426
Registration date: 2007-04-04

PostSubject: Re: Politics   Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:54 am

Wow.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
 

Politics

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 30 of 31Goto page : Previous  1 ... 16 ... 29, 30, 31  Next

Permissions of this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Wizened Women :: Hello, hello :: Chit-chat, News, Real Life, Get motivated-
Post new topic   Reply to topic